Thursday, April 24, 2014

Contemplative Practices in Higher Education, 1

For a GVSU Faculty Teaching & Learning Center retreat in June, I'm reading Contemplative Practices in Higher Education by Barbezat & Bush. Like the books on my religion & spirituality shelves, it speaks deep truths to me.

We want to teach so that students engage with information in ways that let them apply it in their own lives, feel deeply, find meaning, and feel a sense of their own agency (3). Concentrating on goals & outcomes rather than process "makes it difficult to have a mindful attitude," explore, & engage in "creative, synthetic thinking." The latter require a "holistic engagement & attention" which happens when students find themselves in the material, when they're aware of their "thoughts, beliefs, & reactions." Relating to the information, developing relationships with their classmates, & "discerning what is most meaningful to them" is more likely to happen when "students engage in these introspective exercises" -- practices which "have an inward or first-person focus that creates opportunities for greater connection & insight" and "focus on the present experience" (4-5). Contemplative introspection helps students "retain their knowledge better once they have a personal context in which to frame it, ... builds capacity, deepens understanding, generates compassion, & initiates an inquiry into their human nature" (6). Contemplative practices also help students "hone their concentration skills," ... and learn to regulate their emotions through recognizing "triggers" and decreasing their reactions (8). "Students who monitor their progress & explain to themselves what they are learning have greater learning gains & were better problem solvers." Also, if we do not or have not practiced a skill, "we have a tendency to overestimate our abilities" (9) -- we know that from surveying & questioning students in library research sessions!

Contemplative practices can mirror presentation styles--"visual information like form & color is probably best conveyed with visual examples, ... location ... might incorporate movement to help students understand" (9).

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Threshold Concepts & Librarians - ACRL, Tucker, & Akerlind

Listened to the ACRL webinar on Threshold concepts Wednesday, April 23. The things which caught my attention:
  • students as content creators & curators
  • supports our (librarians') conversations with faculty teaching & learning centers
  • encourages collaboration between librarians & classroom faculty
  • we need to creatively re-do our single library research sessions: e.g., teach where info comes from in a database & why it's there instead of searching techniques
  • WHERE design by Wiggins & McTighe* sounds like contemplative T&L
  • new definition of IL - much better
  • no learning outcomes, only an outline of threshold concepts
  • re-envision what we librarians can do
  • not aimed at first-year students (except in high-impact learning experiences)
*(Wiggins, Grant and Jay McTighe. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 1999)

To READ:

Tucker, Virginia Miller. (2012). Acquiring search expertise: Learning experiences and threshold concepts. PhD Thesis. www.virginiatucker.com/docs/VirginiaTucker_thesis_finalA4.pdf‎  or http://eprints.qut.edu.au/63652/

Tucker explored threshold concepts among librarians as searchers. Her work is relevant to the work I've been doing with Leek and Veenstra: for redesigning courses, Akerlind et al "looked not only at student learning outcomes but also at the impact on the thinking and practice of the participant teachers (Akerlind 2012). The decoding-the-disciplines model also provides step-by-step guidance for course design that may be applied (Pace and Middendorf, 2004: Díaz & Pace, 2012)" (261).

Tucker also wrote, "LIS professionals are concerned with competencies that will endure. Threshold concept theory provides a robust framework for studying conceptual knowledge that is independent of shifting technologies" (269).

Follow up with these!

http://thresholdvariation.edu.au/

Akerlind, G., McKenzie, J., and Lupton, M. (2011). Final report: A threshold concepts focus to curriculum design: Supporting student learning through application of variation theory [PDF document]. Retrieved from
http://thresholdvariation.edu.au/sites/default/files/pp8-885_anu_akerlind_final_report_v1.0__3.pdf
(in Threshold Concepts folder)

Coonan, Emma. "Teaching and Learning: Perceptions of Information Literacy." http://ccfil.pbworks.com/f/emma_report_final.pdf
a.k.a. Secker, Jane & Emma Coonan. A New Curriculum for Information Literacy:  transitional▪ transferable ▪ transformational: CURRICULUM AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. Arcadia Project, Cambridge University Library, July 2011.
(in Threshold Concepts folder)

Dìaz, A., Middendorf, J., Pace, D., & Shopkow, L. (2011). Definition of Decoding the Disciplines. Retrieved from: http://decodingthedisciplines.org

Middendorf, J., & Pace, D. (Eds.). (2004). Decoding the Disciplines: Helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 98. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.        (Requested via MEL)